Climate and Health Award: Advancing climate mitigation solutions with health co-benefits in low- and middle-income countries

This funding call will generate a body of evidence on the health effects of climate change mitigation interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This call builds on Wellcome’s previous funding, Advancing climate mitigation policy solutions with health co-benefits in G7 countries. This award will fund transdisciplinary research teams, led by an applicant at an LMIC-based organisation.

Research funded will investigate health effects alongside the social and economic impacts of planned or implemented greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. It will reflect local priorities and produce evidence to drive positive climate and health outcomes.

Overview 

Lead applicant career stage:
Administering organisation location:
Frequency:
One-off
Funding amount:

£500,000-£2 million per project 

Funding duration:

2–4 years

Coapplicants:
Accepted

Next deadline for applications

Calculating next key date…
Application process timeline

Why are we launching this call? 

Building evidence on the health effects of climate change mitigation can help drive ambitious, health-protective mitigation actions. However, almost no evidence currently exists on the health effects of climate change mitigation interventions in LMICs. 

LMICs have historically contributed least to the climate crisis and are already feeling its most acute health impacts. Because of this, high-income countries (HICs) need to go further and faster to decarbonise. Still, the transition to a low carbon economy is critical for LMICs as well (18 out of 30 of the highest emitters today are LMICs). These emerging economies are making decisions in key sectors that could lock-in high-emissions and leave potential health gains unrealised. We want to support evidence generation that will put LMICs at the forefront of this change – defining how climate mitigation action can be positive for health and support local priorities.

This award prioritises research based in and led by LMICs because:

  1. LMICs will have a lot to gain from this transition being done well. As a continent, Africa is home to 60% of the best solar resources globally (IEA, 2022). A transition to renewables could improve air quality, helping to prevent premature deaths from air pollution which currently kills 5 times more people in LMICs than HICs. It could also reduce energy poverty, increasing energy access to the 775 million people globally without electricity, and create jobs (Lancet Countdown, 2023).
  2. LMICs face major risks if transition decisions do not account for both climate and health impacts (for example, low carbon biofuels that cause air pollution). Without centring health, mitigation actions could further entrench extractive industries that are bad for health and worsen inequality.

Through this call, we want to support LMIC-led research that reflects local contexts and priorities, builds capacity and generates evidence that leads to better climate, health, social and economic outcomes.

Who can apply 

Read about the different applicant roles at Wellcome

If you’ve spent time away from research

Career breaks, parental leave, sick leave

You can apply for this award if you have spent time away from research (for example, for a career break, parental leave or long-term sick leave). We will take this into consideration during the review of your application.

Retirement

If you have retired, you must contact us before applying. You must have a guarantee of space from your administering organisation for the duration of the award. 

Working part-time

Lead and coapplicants can be part-time. Part-time applicants should still be able to contribute at least 20% of their research time to the project. Their part-time work should be compatible with delivering the project successfully.

Who can't apply 

You cannot apply for this funding award if:

  • your research team is led by a researcher who does not hold an employment contract with an organisation in an LMIC 
  • you intend to carry out activities which involve the transfer of funds into mainland China
  • you cannot demonstrate that you can dedicate enough time and resources to the project if funded
  • you are already an applicant on two applications for this funding call:
    • you can only be a lead applicant on one application and a coapplicant on another application
    • you can be a coapplicant on two applications
    • you must demonstrate that you have sufficient capacity for both projects if funded. The applications should be for different projects with no overlap of activities. 
  • you already have applied for, or hold, the maximum number of Wellcome awards for your career stage. 

Find out how many Wellcome awards you can apply for, or hold, at one time depending on your career stage.

Check what kinds of research project aren’t right for this scheme.

Is your organisation right for this call?  

The administering organisation is where the lead applicant is based. It is responsible for submitting your final application to Wellcome and managing the finances of the grant if it is awarded.

Where your administering organisation is based

The administering organisation must be in an LMIC.

Other team members, coapplicants and collaborators can be based anywhere in the world apart from mainland China.

Your administering organisation can be a:

  • higher education institution
  • research institute
  • non-academic healthcare organisation
  • not-for-profit or a non-governmental research organisation

Commercial organisations are not eligible to apply as administering organisations for this call. However, coapplicants and collaborators can be based at commercial organisations.

What your administering organisation must do

Your administering organisation must:

  • Give you the workspace and resources they’ll need for the duration of the award.
  • Give you, and any staff employed on the grant, at least 10 days a year (pro rata if part-time) to undertake training and continuing professional development (CPD) in line with the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers. This should include the responsible conduct of research, research leadership, people management, diversity and inclusion, and the promotion of a healthy research culture. 
  • Provide a system of onboarding, embedding and planning for you when you start the award. 
  • Provide you with the status and benefits of other staff of similar seniority.

Your research environment

What is a research environment?

Wellcome believes that a diversity of people and expertise leads to richer understanding and more impactful discoveries. Excellent research happens in environments where people from all backgrounds are treated with respect, are supported and enabled to thrive. 

Our definition of a research environment is not restricted to the quality of the infrastructure, but also considers the culture and behaviours that create excellent research practice. This includes research that is inclusive in design and practice, ethical and engaged with relevant community stakeholders, as well as open and transparent. 

Read more about research environment and culture.

Is your research right for this call? 

What your research proposal must include

Research proposals must include:

  • Interventions – possible, planned or implemented climate change mitigation interventions. Climate change mitigation interventions must reduce current sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, avoid future GHG emissions (e.g. through leapfrogging), and/or protect sinks that sequester carbon from the atmosphere. Interventions can be actions, policies, initiatives or similar. They do not have to be officially labelled as ‘climate change mitigation interventions’, so long as they meet the above definition. 
  • Outcomes – Interventions should be assessed on:
    • Climate outcomes: through appropriate methods to quantitatively estimate current and/or future changes in GHG emissions or absorption (for example, IPCC guidance or GHG Protocol), including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), or short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon (BC).
    • Health outcomes: through quantitative measurements or estimates of health impacts (for example, all-cause or cause-specific mortality, years of life lost, DALYS, morbidity from communicable diseases, for example vector-borne diseases, or non-communicable diseases for example, respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, birthweight, cognitive and lung development in children, and mental health). Studies that model or measure changes in exposures that are known to have strong links to health outcomes (for example, environmental risk factors included in the Global Burden of Disease Assessment) are eligible. However, we will prioritise those that estimate changes in health outcomes.
    • Wider social and/or economic outcomes: through measured or estimated changes to the well-established social determinants of health (for example, housing, income or working conditions), social impacts of local priority (for example, gendered impacts or energy access), economic impacts of health outcomes (for example, Value of Statistical Life), economic impacts of the intervention itself (for example, cost, return on investment or jobs). 
  • Adaptation – Any maladaptation implications of the intervention. We encourage proposals to also look at win-win mitigation-adaptation scenarios.
  • Transdisciplinary knowledge generation – Relevant non-academic stakeholders within the research team or a detailed plan for how to develop partnerships with relevant non-academic stakeholders within the first year of the grant. We are asking for a transdisciplinary approach to help ensure research relevance and impact.
  • Need – A clear evidence gap and a clear demand or need for the proposed research from key stakeholders (for example, policymakers, NGOs, advocates, affected communities or industry) – responding to locally led priorities and challenges. The proposal must have a high-level theory of change, outlining the pathway from research to impact.
  • Equitable partnerships – Evidence of equitable partnership principles in practice. The UK Collaborative on Development Research (UKCDR) has lots of resources on this topic; a good starting place is ‘Four Approaches to Supporting Equitable Partnerships’.

What your research proposal can include

Your research proposal can include:

  • Interventions undertaken in any sector(s), for example: Energy; Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU); Transport; Buildings; Industry; Waste; and Land, Coastal and Ocean Sinks, and Engineered Sinks. Direct and indirect carbon pricing interventions are also eligible, including carbon taxes, emissions trading schemes, carbon crediting, taxes on fuels, subsidy removal.
  • Interventions can be single solutions carried out within single sectors, multiple actions carried out in single sectors (e.g., system transitions), or multiple actions carried out across multiple sectors.
  • Analysis of impacts at a local, sub-national, national or regional level.
  • Best practice methods as outlined in Hess et al., (2020)  to model the health and wider social and economic effects of mitigation interventions in LMICs. Modelling studies should compare mitigation interventions against a business as usual / non-mitigation intervention. Studies can: (i) incorporate modelled changes in environment/systems (e.g. air quality modelling, noise modelling), ecosystem services modelling (e.g. system dynamics models) and/or behaviour (e.g. increase in physical activity, changes in diet choices) (Castillo et al., 2021Thierry et al., 2021, Hess et al., 2020); and (ii) combine this with modelled health outcomes (e.g. using exposure-response functions). Studies modelling demand-side/demand reduction policies (measures that “avoid demand for energy, materials, land and water while delivering human well-being for all within planetary boundaries”) must specify how the demand shift has been or would be achieved.
  • Best practice methods to measure the health, climate, and wider social and economic effects of mitigation interventions in LMICs. Observational studies, e.g. natural experiments, can report the health effects of mitigation interventions; and/or experimental studies, such as randomised control trials, can directly measure the health effects of a mitigation intervention.
  • Engaged research methodologies to build knowledge on how to promote uptake of evidence by key stakeholders (e.g. policymakers, NGOs, advocates, affected communities, industry).

Kinds of research that are not right for this call

Research that is not right for this call includes:

  • Interventions where adaptation is the central focus, with limited mitigation benefits. 
  • Interventions solely focused on healthcare decarbonisation.
  • Only estimating or measuring impacts on social and economic outcomes that are indirectly related to health (e.g. GDP growth, job creation, income levels) without additional health outcome estimates/measurements.
  • Studies focused solely on conducting systematic reviews, evidence syntheses or on the development of methods, models, tools or guidance.

Read about the kinds of research we fund through this programme

Check if your project is in scope with our team.

Research costs we’ll cover 

You should ask for a level and duration of funding that is justifiable for your proposed research. You must justify all costs within your application. We will assess the proportion of resource allocation between organisations based in LMICs and HICs.  

Learn how Wellcome grant payments work

How to apply 

1. Before you apply

  • Make sure you read everything on this page.
  • You do not need to contact us before your write and submit your application.
  • We held a webinar about this award on 9 December 2024 at 10.30 GMT. Watch the recording of this webinar.

2. Submit your preliminary application

3. Shortlisting of preliminary applications

  • We will check your eligibility for the call and that your preliminary application is within the funding remit for this award.
  • Wellcome staff will review your preliminary application. 
  • You will be informed of the decision on your preliminary application approximately one month after the preliminary application deadline.
  • We are unable to provide feedback on applications that are not shortlisted.

4. Invitation to full application 

If invited to submit a full application, you will complete your application on the Wellcome Funding platform. Shortlisted applicants will have approximately two months to prepare their full applications.

5. Submit your full application to your administering organisation for approval

  • Complete your application form on Wellcome Funding platform
  • Submit it to the 'authorised approver' at your administering organisation for approval. Make sure you leave enough time for the approver to review and submit your application before the deadline. The approver may ask you to make changes to your application.
  • If this is your organisation’s first time applying for Wellcome funding, they will need to contact us to request an organisation account. Email fundingsupport@wellcome.org with your organisation’s:
    • Name
    • Address
    • Country
    • Team email address for the people who will approve and submit your application (this is usually a research management team).
  • We will create the organisation account and provide access to the approvers. Review our guidance for research offices.

6. Administering organisation approves and submits it to Wellcome

Your application must be submitted by 17:00 BST on the deadline day. 

7. Committee review 

  • A committee will review proposals and make funding recommendations to Wellcome.
  • Committee members will be chosen based on their expertise within the relevant research field. Committee membership will be comprised of a diverse range of international members and will take into account Wellcome’s diversity and inclusion priorities.
  • Once the committee has been appointed, we will update this webpage to include its details.

8. Funding decision

  • Final funding decisions will be made by Wellcome.
  • You will receive an email notification of the funding decision soon after the decision has been made in August 2025. 
  • The reasons for a decision will be provided to unsuccessful applicants in writing.

Where to apply

You need to apply for this scheme on the Wellcome Funding Platform. You can save your application and return to it at any time. 

Get some tips to help you write your grant application

Download application questions

Timing considerations for your application

You must leave enough time to make sure:

  • you read everything on this page before applying
  • you and your coapplicants to complete the application
  • your administering organisation to review, offer feedback and for you to apply any amendments suggests
  • you submit the pre-application to Wellcome by 17.00 GMT 18 February 2025.

Getting support with your application

If you need further support with completing your application, please contact us.

Disability support

If you are disabled or have a long-term health condition, we offer support to help you with the grant application process. We can also provide support completing your project. For example, providing costs for assistive technology or assistance animals.

View our disability-related support for applicants

How applications are assessed 

The application process consists of two stages:

  • a preliminary application stage, where proposals will be shortlisted
  • a full application stage, where shortlisted applicants are invited to submit full applications for review by a committee of experts.

Preliminary applications

All preliminary applications will be assessed on:

  • Whether the research aims and objectives are clearly articulated and in line with the above stated research priorities (see what your research must include).
  • Whether the proposed team structure includes expertise in climate change mitigation and health, and details proposed or already established non-academic stakeholder collaborations.
  • The likelihood that evidence generated will fill a need relevant to policy or practice, driving action that delivers positive climate and health outcomes. 
  • The appropriateness of the project timeline and budget.

Full applications

All applications will be evaluated using the same weighted assessment criteria.

Essential criteria and weightings

Feasibility (20% weighting)

  • The research objectives are clear and achievable.
  • Work packages are clear and will deliver on the research objectives within the proposed timeframe. 
  • Equitable partnership principals are demonstrated and resourced. 
  • Sufficient resources have been allocated to complete the work, and the proportion of funds allocated to organisations located in LMICs is appropriate. 

Research Methods (30% weighting)

  • The proposed research uses best-practice methods to answer research questions. 
  • The application demonstrates that the research team is aware of current and relevant research and knowledge. The proposed research may challenge paradigms but is built off sound principles.
  • Engaged research practices are used to support research uptake. For example, co-design activities are planned at the implementation phase of the proposal.

Research Team (20% weighting)

  • The leadership and management approach are convincing and coherent. Local researchers are substantively involved in the leadership, design and delivery of the research project (at minimum one applicant from each country where the research will take place).
  • The research team is transdisciplinary and includes an appropriate combination of expertise to execute the research.
    • Where partnerships with non-academic stakeholders still need to be established, a clear plan for how to develop these partnerships is outlined and can be feasibly executed within the first year of the grant.
  • The research team includes the necessary skills to execute the project. Relevant skills may include:
    • prior experience of researchers engaging with policy, practitioners and/or implementation partners
    • knowledge brokering competencies such as the ability to act as a bridge between research producers and users
    • the ability to facilitate social learning and translate research for different contexts and audiences.

Impact of Research (30% weighting)

  • Research outputs will fill an evidence gap. 
  • Research outputs will resolve a demand for evidence (e.g. a direct demand, long-standing issue, debate or critical question) by stakeholders who can drive actions that deliver positive climate and health outcomes.
  • The research will lead to actionable evidence to support policy and/or practice to drive actions that deliver positive climate and health outcomes.
  • The proposal has a high-level theory of change, outlining the pathway from research to impact.

If you are funded 

All successful applicants to this call will be supported with cohort support, organised and provided by Wellcome. The intention of the cohort support is to meet any developmental needs identified by the cohort, share learnings between the cohort, and help maximise the impact of research outputs.

Key dates 

You must submit your application by 17:00 GMT/BST on the deadline day. We don’t accept late applications.

  1. 27 November 2024

    Full details of the award are published and the call opens to applications

  2. 9 December 2024

    Webinar

    Watch the recording
  3. 18 February 2025

    Preliminary application deadline

  4. March 2025

    Full applications invited

  5. 3 June 2025

    Full application deadline

Contact us