Mental Health Award: Transforming early intervention for anxiety, depression and psychosis in young people
Funding for projects that robustly test the real-world effectiveness and assess implementation strategies of scalable transformative early interventions for anxiety, depression and psychosis in young people.
Overview
- Lead applicant career stage:
- Administering organisation location:
- Anywhere in the world (apart from mainland China)
- Frequency:
- One-off
- Funding amount:
£200,000 for the Foundation Phase and £5 million to £8 million for the Impact Phase
- Funding duration:
12 months for the Foundation Phase and up to 5 years for the Impact Phase
- Coapplicants:
- Required
This award is structured in two phases:
Foundation Phase (open to applications week commencing 28 July 2025)
This first phase of the funding call will provide teams with £200,000 to build their teams and develop their detailed proposal for their research study over 12 months. This research proposal must be for a definitive effectiveness study and assessment of strategies for implementation and scaling of a psychological and/or a social intervention. The research must take place in the UK or a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). The proposal must capture multiple outcomes that are relevant to people with lived experience and implementing partners, including mental health outcomes, functional outcomes and full economic evaluation.
Projects will be chosen for the Foundation Phase based on:
the existing evidence of efficacy for the intervention
potential for being taken to scale, with the cost of the intervention low enough to be sustainable in the proposed context
potential for sustainable partnerships between research teams and implementing partners
outline plans for real-world testing of the effectiveness and implementation of the intervention
Teams taking part in the Foundation Phase will be invited to be part of a community of practice to participate and share learning in key areas relevant to developing, implementing and scaling psychological and/or social interventions. Wellcome will provide support to teams during the Foundation Phase as they develop their research proposals.
Impact Phase (open to applications February 2027)
In the second phase of the funding call, all funded teams from the Foundation Phase will be invited to apply for the Impact Phase. We expect the award amount for the Impact Phase to be between £5 million and £8 million and the duration to be up to 5 years. The upper limits will be confirmed during the Foundation Phase.
Who can apply
You can apply to this call if you are a team:
- From any relevant discipline. We consider a broad range of disciplines to be relevant to mental health science, including but not limited to those listed in our principles of mental health funding.
- From eligible organisations.
- Based anywhere in the world (apart from mainland China). The research itself must take place in the United Kingdom and/or low- or middle- income countries.
Your experience
The team must:
- Include the necessary research expertise, technical skills and organisational support to deliver the proposed research. Team expertise should be diverse and interdisciplinary for:
- supporting the generation of evidence for real-world effectiveness
- conducting a full economic evaluation
- assessing implementation and scaling strategies of interventions
- Include expertise in:
- mental health
- lived experience
- clinical trials
- statistics
- health economics
- implementation science
- Be led by an experienced researcher due to the size of the Impact Phase award. We are committed to ensuring the involvement and development of early-career researchers as part of these awards and require one early-career researcher be named as a coapplicant. Early-career researchers must have completed a PhD or equivalent research degree, or if a researcher in the humanities or social sciences have at least four years' equivalent research experience. They should have no more than three years of postdoctoral experience. The rest of the team can include researchers at any stage of their career.
- Include implementation partners. At least one implementation partner must be included as a coapplicant. Implementation partners are key stakeholders who enable the implementation of the intervention in the intended context. They are individuals with the authority to impact or make decisions regarding implementation and scaling. This could be either inside or outside of health systems. This is not an exhaustive list and more than one implementation partner may be essential for your project. Implementation partners can include individuals from:
- national or local government agencies
- private sector providers
- healthcare providers
- education providers
- non-government organisations
- community groups
- international organisations
- Include either a lead applicant or coapplicant based in each country where the research will take place.
- Be an appropriate size for the proposed project. Teams must consist of at least three applicants (lead applicant and two coapplicants) and must not exceed twelve applicants (lead applicant and eleven coapplicants). There is no limit on the number of collaborators.
- Include people with lived experience of mental health problems as part of the project team. This may include, but is not limited to:
- expert advisors
- coapplicants
- collaborators
- advisory group members
- Must include the skills needed within the overall team to effectively involve and collaborate with lived experience experts.
The lead applicant must:
- Have the experience needed to lead the development of a collaborative, large scale research project of an intervention, ensuring the necessary support structures are in place for this.
- Have experience of, or demonstrate commitment to, effectively leading a team that embeds lived experience expertise, as relevant to the research project.
- Have a permanent, open-ended or long-term rolling contract, or the guarantee of one, for the duration of the Foundation Phase and Impact Phase awards. The contract should not be conditional on receiving this award. Lead applicants with less than three years remaining on their contract at the point of application must have secured their next position at an eligible organisation and provide a letter of support from them.
- Be able to demonstrate why they are the best person to lead the research. We will only consider lead applicants based outside the country where of the proposed research is taking place if there is a clear justification for their leadership.
- Be able to contribute at least 20% of their research time to this project. If the applicant does not have protected research time, they must be able to contribute 20% of their time to this award.
- Be based at an eligible organisation that can sign up to our grant conditions.
Read more about when lead applicants can request salary costs, and what other costs can be covered.
Coapplicants can be based at the same or different organisations as other applicants, including in different countries. Researchers can be at any career stage and come from any relevant discipline, but at least one coapplicant must be an early-career researcher.
At least one coapplicant must be an implementation partner.
Each coapplicant must:
- Be essential for the delivery of the project and make a significant contribution. For example, in designing the proposed research or leading a specific component of the project.
- Have a guarantee of space from their administering organisation for the duration of their commitment to the project. They do not need to have a permanent, open-ended or long-term rolling contract.
- Be able to contribute at least 10% of their research time. Coapplicants who do not have protected research time and implementation partners who are coapplicants must be able to contribute at least 10% of their time to this award.
- Be based at an eligible organisation that can sign up to our grant conditions. This can include a sole trader or self-employed person’s business.
Read more about when coapplicants can request salary, and what other costs can be covered.
Collaborators are distinct from coapplicants. Collaborators support the delivery of the project but don't lead on a specific component of the project. For example, collaborators could support by:
- sharing facilities
- providing access to resources, such as datasets and clinical records sharing subject-specific knowledge and guidance
- providing feedback through the research process based on their specific expertise
Collaborators are not paid for their input but you can request costs for their expenses. Collaborators are not assessed for eligibility and they are not required to give a minimum time commitment to the award.
Read about the different applicant roles at Wellcome.
If you’ve spent time away from research
Career breaks, parental leave, sick leave
You can apply for this award if you have spent time away from research (for example, for a career break, parental leave or long-term sick leave). We will take this into consideration during the review of your application.
Retirement
If you have retired, you must contact us before applying. You must have a guarantee of space from your administering organisation for the duration of the award.
Working part-time
Lead and coapplicants can be part-time. Part-time applicants should still be able to contribute at least 20% of their research time to the project if a lead applicant and 10% if a coapplicant . Applicants who do not have protected research time and implementation partners must be able to contribute at least 20% of their time to the award if a lead applicant and 10% if a coapplicant. Their part-time work should be compatible with delivering the project successfully.
Who can’t apply
You cannot apply for this call if:
- You intend to carry out activities which involve the transfer of funds into mainland China.
- You cannot demonstrate that you can dedicate enough time and resources to the project, if funded.
- You are already an applicant on two applications for this funding call:
- You can only be a lead applicant on one application and a coapplicant on another one.
- You can be a coapplicant on two applications.
- You must demonstrate that you have sufficient capacity for both projects if funded. The applications should be for different projects with no overlap of activities.
- You already have applied for, or hold, the maximum number of Wellcome awards for your career stage. Find out how many Wellcome awards you can apply for, or hold, at one time depending on your career stage.
- Your proposed research does not fit the aims of this award. Check if your research is right for this call.
Is your organisation right for this call?
The administering organisation is where the lead applicant is based. It is the organisation responsible for submitting your final application to Wellcome and managing the finances of the grant if it is awarded.
Where your administering organisation is based
The administering organisation can be based anywhere in the world apart from mainland China. However, the research must take place in the United Kingdom and/or low- or middle-income countries (LMICs).
At the Foundation Phase, the administering organisation must be one of the following:
- higher education institution
- research institute
- non-academic healthcare organisation
- not-for-profit or non-governmental organisation
Commercial organisations cannot be the administering organisation. We recognise the important role commercial partners may play in developing and scaling interventions and welcome them as coapplicants and collaborators. If you are funded through the Foundation Phase and there is a strong rationale for a commercial organisation to be the administering organisation at the Impact Phase, you will have an opportunity to inform us of this at the next phase.
What's expected of lead applicant and coapplicant organisations
We expect organisations based in the UK to meet the responsibilities required by the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers for institutions, managers and researchers.
Any organisation with Wellcome funding that is based outside the UK is expected, as a minimum, to follow the principles of the Concordat.
We also expect organisations to:
- Guarantee that the space and resources applicants need have been agreed and will be made available to them from the start date through to the end date of the award.
- Explain how the application fits with the strategic aims of the organisation.
- Give applicants, and any staff employed on the grant, 10 days a year (pro rata if part-time) to undertake training and continuing professional development (CPD) in line with the Concordat. This should include the responsible conduct of research, research leadership, people management, diversity and inclusion, and the promotion of a healthy research culture.
- Provide a system of onboarding, embedding and planning for staff when they join the organisation and/or start the award.
Collaboration agreements
If the application involves a collaboration or partnership between multiple organisations, the partners must enter into a suitable collaboration agreement, including provisions that cover:
- confidentiality
- publication rights
- access to background intellectual property
- ownership of foreground intellectual property
- arrangements for the protection, management and exploitation of foreground intellectual property
The lead applicant’s administering organisation is required under our grant conditions to own all the foreground intellectual property arising from the project and to take the lead in any commercialisation activity. For guidance, read Wellcome's intellectual property policy.
Your research environment
Wellcome believes that a diversity of people and expertise leads to richer understanding and more impactful discoveries. Excellent research happens in environments where people from all backgrounds are treated with respect, are supported and enabled to thrive.
Our definition of a research environment is not limited to the quality of the infrastructure, but also considers the culture and behaviours that create excellent research practice. This includes research that is inclusive in design and practice, ethical and engaged with relevant community stakeholders, as well as open and transparent.
This is an important requirement for Wellcome funding, and it will be assessed at the Impact Phase but not the Foundation Phase.
Read guidance on how to talk about research environment in your application.
Is your research right for this call?
There are hundreds of millions of people being held back by mental health challenges across the globe. The majority of mental health problems start in adolescence or early adulthood. We are looking for interventions that can reach large numbers of people in a low-cost and sustainable way.
What your proposal must include
Your Foundation Phase project proposal must:
Interventions must:
- be a psychological and/or social intervention
- focus on early intervention for anxiety, depression and/or psychosis
- be targeted at young people, between the ages of 10 and 30
- have one or more clear active ingredients identified for how the main components of the intervention produce a therapeutic effect
- have existing robust evidence for efficacy in the same broad age group, the same condition and the same mode of delivery that is being proposed for this funding call
- have an outlined pathway to implementation at scale
Psychological and/or social interventions
This funding is focused on psychological and/or social interventions only.
We define these terms broadly and consider in scope any intervention targeting improvements in a person’s mental health by changing their cognitions, emotions or behaviours by influencing psychological processes and/or interventions targeting social connections or social determinants of mental health.
Psychological and/or social interventions can be delivered:
- through any mode, including face-to-face, telehealth, mobile apps and online platforms
- using any method, such as individual therapy, group therapy, community-based and peer support or a policy initiative
- delivered in any setting, for example, within a school, community, healthcare service
Mental health conditions in scope
This funding call invites proposals targeting early intervention for anxiety, depression and psychotic disorders. This includes:
- all types of anxiety (including obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder)
- all types of depressive disorders (including post-natal depression)
- all forms of psychotic disorders (including schizophrenia, postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder)
We recognise the flaws, complexity and overlap inherent in current diagnostic categories. Therefore, proposals may focus on specific symptoms, including transdiagnostic symptoms that cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries and are shared by multiple disorders. This approach allows for innovative pathways to understanding and treating mental health conditions.
While we do not prescribe any specific diagnostic or classification system, applicants are expected to employ a framework and measurement approach aligned with their research aims. A clear rationale for the chosen approach should be provided.
Age range in scope
We will consider interventions focused on people aged between 10 and 30, however our priority is to support intervening as early as possible in this age group. We are particularly interested to fund projects with interventions targeted at people under 18. We are including a larger age range to account for the later onset of psychosis and recognising that there are often delays in identifying and diagnosing mental health problems, particularly in low- and middle- income countries.
Active ingredients
Research proposals must identify the active ingredient(s) of the intervention. If it is a complex, multi component intervention, the active ingredient of each component must be identified. An active ingredient refers to the specific element or component within the intervention that is responsible for its intended effects. It is the part of the intervention that directly contributes to achieving the desired outcome or change, such as a specific therapy technique, a particular educational strategy, or a behavioural or social modification method. This builds on Wellcome’s active ingredients commission which was focussed on youth anxiety and depression.
The active ingredient can either have been empirically demonstrated or have a strong theoretical foundation. You must include a logic model with your application that identifies the active ingredient. This should be uploaded as additional information to support your application.
Evidence for efficacy
This funding call is not designed to develop new interventions. We want to fund the robust evaluation and scaling of existing interventions where efficacy has already been shown.
We define efficacy as the ability of an intervention to produce its intended effects under controlled and ideal conditions.
As a minimum, interventions must already have demonstrated efficacy, characterised by:
- Success in two or more randomised controlled trials or other rigorous study design suitable for social interventions such as quasi-experimental studies or comprehensive observational research. These must include:
- efficacy data in the same broad age group and mental health condition
- at least one study to demonstrate efficacy of the intervention using the same mode (for example, including face-to-face, telehealth, mobile apps and online platforms) and delivery method (for example, individual therapy, group therapy, community-based and peer support) as the current application.
- Evidence that changes in standardised mental health or functional outcomes are attributable to the intervention, supported by careful design and analysis to minimise external variable influence.
Proposals can be based on adapting the intervention to a different geographical or contextual setting, a different dose or be delivered by a different workforce to the existing efficacy data.
Proposals will also be considered if the intervention has already been demonstrated to be efficacious in a real-world setting.
The efficacy data must demonstrate a quantifiable impact of the intervention on a validated mental health or functional outcome. This should be both statistically significant and clinically meaningful in line with the priorities of those with lived experience. Evidence may come from both quantitative and qualitative research.
Pathway to implementation and scale
The cost of the proposed intervention must be low enough to be scalable and sustainable in the proposed context.
Proposals must demonstrate how an intervention that has been shown to be effective on a small scale and/or under controlled or well-supported research conditions, will be scaled up and implemented effectively, while maintaining the active ingredient(s) of the intervention. This must include considerations of feasibility related to costs, workforce, time and infrastructure. You must outline how the intervention will be scaled to reach a greater number of eligible people in more than one setting or type of setting, while retaining its effectiveness. A setting is broadly defined and could be, for example, a school, a healthcare organisation, a community, a city, a town, a village or a country.
Implementation partners are key to enable sustainable implementation of the intervention in the intended context. They are individuals with the authority to impact or make decisions regarding implementation and scaling. This could be either inside or outside of health systems. Some examples of implementation partners may include (this list is not exhaustive):
- national or local government agencies
- private sector providers
- healthcare providers
- education providers
- non-government organisations
- community groups
- international organisations
Implementation partners should be engaged throughout the project lifecycle, including developing the research questions and designing the implementation strategies. Co-development of the project with implementation partners ensures that the research is relevant to their needs and priorities, making it more likely that the intervention will be taken up and scaled.
The project proposal must identify how the Foundation Phase will be used to consolidate and further develop relationships between research teams and implementation partners, to build and maintain long-term sustainable partnerships. It must detail the team’s plans for co-designing a robust project plan for the Impact Phase. Where there are gaps in team skills and expertise relevant to the project delivery, the funding proposal must outline how the Foundation Phase funding will be used to address them.
Sustainable partnerships are built on shared goals, mutual respect, and genuine commitment to achieving a common vision. The nesta partnership toolkit provides guidance on building sustainable partnerships.
We expect fairness and equity to be considered in all partnerships and we use the UKCDR definition of an equitable partnership, “partnerships in which there is mutual participation, mutual trust and respect, mutual benefit and equal value placed on each partners’ contribution at all stages of the research process”. These resources provide guidance on how to approach equitable partnerships in different aspects of a research project:
- the UKCDR & ESSENCE Equitable Partnerships Resource Hub
- the TRUST Code:
- consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships
The Foundation Phase can include:
- sustainable partnership building and engagement activities with researchers and implementation partners
- training and skills development (including research skills and formal qualifications/credit bearing courses if relevant)
- developing meaningful lived experience involvement plans
- landscaping activities that assess the local context to understand the social, economic, and cultural environment and map available resources
- theory of change workshops for intervention implementation and scaling
- co-design of the project plan for real-world testing of the intervention
- co-development of the intervention’s pathway to implementation and scaling
- networking and knowledge exchange activities
Proposals at the Foundation Phase must include an outline for a definitive effectiveness study. We recognise that measuring both clinical symptoms and functioning are crucial to assessing the effectiveness of an intervention. You must therefore incorporate at least one measure of functioning such as (but not limited to) work, school or relationships into your project plan. The measure must be relevant to people with lived experience and implementing partners. This work must also comply with our policy on research involving human participants.
Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are considered gold standard. However, there may be practical and ethical reasons why an RCT is not the best method to test the effectiveness of an intervention under real-world conditions. Other robust methods that measure trends over time may be more suitable in some circumstances. Examples of acceptable evidence for effectiveness and implementation include:
- RCTs (hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials, stepped wedge design, cluster randomised trial, adaptive design)
- strong comparison group designs
- instrumental variables
- regression discontinuity
- difference in difference
- mendelian randomisation
Projects must include an outline plan for a full economic evaluation of the intervention with justification given for the proposed method. Full economic evaluations compare the costs of at least two competing options (for instance, a new intervention versus the existing standard of care) to determine the additional cost of one intervention over another or the existing standard of care and the gains to society of that additional cost. Gains to society might include:
- better healthcare outcomes
- improved quality of life
- increased productivity in the workforce
- better educational outcomes
- reduced healthcare costs
Research plans must outline how they will test strategies for implementation and scaling by employing a validated theoretical or conceptual framework and including implementation outcomes.
The 12-month Foundation Phase funding should be used to further develop research plans in collaboration with implementation partners.
Proposals must involve people with lived experience of anxiety, depression and/or psychosis, relevant to your research topic. There are a range of ways that research teams can involve and collaborate with lived experience experts. This may include, but is not limited to:
- expert advisors
- coapplicants
- collaborators
- advisory group members
Lived experience experts should be engaged as colleagues who use their knowledge and expertise to inform the strategic direction, governance, design and delivery of the research. Lived Experience experts should be based out of or be familiar with the local context where the research is taking place. They must be involved in appropriate and ethical ways to inform multiple aspects and stages of the research project. Their contribution should not be limited to recruitment and retention strategies.
You should budget for and compensate people who provide lived experience expertise appropriately to their role and the scale of the project.
Proposals must use, as a minimum, one or more of our recommended common measures in the collection of new data. You may also collect data using any other measure(s).
Type of research that is not right for this call
Research proposals that are not right for this call:
- Include conducting significant primary research during the Foundation Phase. The major primary research component should be reserved for completion during the Impact Phase.
- Primarily target neurodevelopmental conditions, neurodegenerative diseases, or mental health disorders and symptoms outside of the broad categories of anxiety, depression, and/or psychosis. For example, proposals with eating disorders or substance abuse as the primary focus of the research are not in scope.
- Include research that takes place in countries outside of the United Kingdom or low- or middle- income countries.
- Focus solely on general well-being rather than validated mental health outcomes or symptoms of anxiety, depression and psychosis.
- Focus solely on exploratory or curiosity-driven mechanistic research that is not directly relevant to the scope of the call.
- Include an intervention that:
- Is not primarily a psychological and/or social intervention.
- Lacks theory and some understanding of its active ingredients.
- Does not have efficacy data provided by at least two studies.
- Is intended for universal/primary prevention.
- Is not focused on reducing symptom severity and/or functional impairment.
- Solely focuses on diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring of symptoms. These may be an additional focus where the primary focus of the intervention is treatment.
- Does not demonstrate the potential for scalability.
- Relies entirely on artificial intelligence systems to make predictions and provide recommendations, without transparent insight into how those predictions are made.
- Is solely for tracking and/or supporting self-management of symptoms of mental health conditions with no other psychological or social interventional component.
How applications are assessed
Proposals submitted at the Foundation Phase must include an outline plan for the Impact Phase comprising:
- plan for assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention
- completion of a full economic evaluation
- testing of strategies for implementation and scaling
Funding proposals must detail how the 12-month Foundation Phase funding will be used to build sustainable partnerships and co-develop a full project plan for the Impact Phase.
Nine months after the start of the Foundation Phase, funded teams will be invited to submit a research proposal with details of the work packages that will be carried out during the Impact Phase. Where relevant, Impact Phase applications should also indicate if initial plans and team have changed or evolved based on the outcomes of the Foundation Phase. Teams will have approximately 3 months to submit their applications for the Impact Phase and more detailed guidance will be provided to assist them in this process.
All applications for the Foundation Phase will be evaluated using the weighted assessment criteria. Applications will be reviewed by a panel of experts, including lived experience experts and an international youth panel.
Essential criteria and weightings
There are five weighted assessment criteria for applications to the Foundation Phase:
strength, scalability and sustainability of the intervention (30%)
suitability of the proposed methodology (20%)
suitability and expertise of the team (20%)
lived experience involvement (20%)
review by a youth panel (10%)
1. Strength, scalability and sustainability of the intervention (30%)
- Strong justification that the intervention can be taken to scale, with the cost of delivery of the intervention low enough to be sustainable in the proposed context and evidence of acceptability to end users (including young people).
- Evidence for efficacy of the intervention is rigorous and well-described. There is a demonstrated quantifiable impact of the intervention on a validated measure of mental health or functioning. This will be both statistically significant and clinically meaningful in line with the priorities of those with lived experience.
- Strong evidence demonstrating the active ingredient(s) of the intervention, the quality of the intervention logic model and articulation of how these will be maintained when delivering the intervention at scale
2. Suitability of the proposed methodology (20%)
- Clear strategies for developing sustainable partnerships with implementation partners ensuring effective co-production of the research and the pathway to impact. A clear rationale is provided for the activities and assurance that they can be delivered effectively within the available resources and timeframe during the Foundation Phase.
- For the proposed research in the Impact Phase, the plans include outlines of the methodology for:
- assessing the intervention’s real-world effectiveness with outcomes that are relevant to people with lived experience and implementation partners, including mental health outcomes and functional outcomes
- evaluating implementation and scaling strategies, using a validated theoretical or conceptual framework, encompassing robust study design and implementation outcomes.
- a full economic evaluation of the intervention
3. Suitability and expertise of the team (20%)
The project features an integrated, collaborative plan of work, developed by a team that includes those with the appropriate research expertise as well as implementation partners.
The team:
- Has clearly identified implementation partners, at least one of whom is a coapplicant, with a rationale and plan for the role of implementation partner(s).
- Is composed of individuals with the necessary expertise and technical skills, alongside a diversity of disciplines and perspectives. Plans are in place to obtain any missing expertise during the Foundation Phase, where relevant.
- Provides evidence of existing implementation partner relationships through letters of support, with plans to strengthen, expand and include new partners where relevant.
- Has appropriate management plans in place, describing the equitable organisation and day-to-day management of the collaboration.
- Includes lived experience experts or possesses the skills to effectively involve and collaborate with people with lived experience of mental health problems.
- Includes at least one early-career researcher as a coapplicant on the award
The lead applicant:
- Possesses the necessary experience to deliver both the Foundation and Impact Phases of the project. This will include:
- the ability to build sustainable, meaningful collaborations across multiple partners
- evidence of capability to lead a large-scale, collaborative research project, within budget and within time
- the necessary support structures in place to enable them to have the time and support to deliver the project
The coapplicant(s):
- hold(s) the expertise, time and resources essential to make significant contributions to the project
4. Lived Experience Involvement (20%)
- People with lived experience are meaningfully involved at multiple stages, including the conception, planning, design, delivery and dissemination of the proposal. There is a clear rationale for their inclusion (or exclusion) at each stage.
- Where necessary, the project includes a comprehensive strategy to equip people with lived experience with the essential knowledge and skills needed for meaningful participation.
- Lived experience perspectives are represented across the proposal, including in the team’s leadership and governance roles.
- Lived experience experts have relevant experience and expertise applicable to the research, including being representative of the research location.
- People with lived experience are compensated appropriately for their time and labour.
5. Review by a youth panel (10%)
The final 10% of the weighted assessment will come from an international panel of young people. As the call is focused on interventions for young people, it is important that their perspectives are included in decision making. Young people will be asked to review the plain language summary of the intervention that must be uploaded with your application.
Young people will be asked to share their assessment of:
- the clarity of the intervention and its underlying mechanisms
- acceptability of the intervention to young people
- barriers that would significantly hinder youth participation in the intervention and how these will be addressed
Research costs we’ll cover
Each successful team will receive a grant of £200,000. Please complete the application budget section outlining how you would allocate these funds across the activities proposed. The total must add up to £200,000 (or equivalent if applying in a different currency).
Lead applicant
You must contribute at least 20% of your research time to the award.
Lead applicants based in the UK or Republic of Ireland
You cannot ask for your salary if you work for a:
- higher education institution
- research institute
- healthcare organisation
You can ask for a contribution to your salary if you work for a:
- charity
- non-governmental organisation (NGO)
- social enterprise
The amount we pay will be proportionate to the time you contribute to the award, for example if you contribute 30% of your time to the award we will fund 30% of your salary.
Lead applicants based outside of the UK or Republic of Ireland
You can ask for a contribution to your salary if you work for a:
- higher education institute
- research institute
- healthcare organisation
- charity
- non-governmental organisation
- social enterprise
If you work for a higher education institute, research institute, or healthcare organisation, we will only pay your salary if you hold a permanent, open-ended or long-term rolling contract that states that you must get your salary from external grant funding. Your administering organisation must confirm:
- your employment contract states you must get salary recovery from external grant funding
- they will underwrite the salary and post for the period of time that you will be working on the grant
In all cases, the amount we pay will be proportionate to the time you contribute to the award. For example, if you contribute 30% of your time to the award we will fund 30% of your salary.
Coapplicants
Coapplicants must contribute at least 10% of their research time to the award. Coapplicants who do not have protected research time and implementation partners must be able to contribute 10% of their time to this award.
Coapplicants employed by higher education institutes, research institutes or healthcare organisations
1. Coapplicants who don’t have permanent, open ended or long-term rolling contracts
The amount we pay will be proportionate to the time they contribute to the award, for example if they contribute 30% of their time to the award we will fund 30% of their salary. The coapplicant’s employing organisation must confirm:
- their employment contract states they must get salary recovery from external grant funding
- they will underwrite the post, including any salary costs not covered by Wellcome, for the period of time that the person will be working on the grant
2. Coapplicants without a permanent, open ended or long-term rolling contract can request salary depending on the amount of their time they will spend on the grant:
- Less than 80% of coapplicant’s time on the grant: they can request salary proportionate to the time they will spend on the grant. Their organisation must guarantee space and salary support if they cannot get it from other sources for the period of time they are working on the grant. Their post cannot be dependent on the application being successful.
- 80% or more of coapplicant’s time on the grant: they can ask for their full salary. Their organisation does not have to guarantee salary support if salary cannot be obtained from other sources for the period of time they are working on the grant. The post can be dependent on the application being successful.
- If the coapplicants are employed on the award as research assistants and they are to spend 100% of their time on the award, their post does not need to be underwritten by the administering organisation and can be dependent on the application being successful.
Alternatively, coapplicants may get their salary through employment on another grant.
Coapplicants employed by charities, social enterprises, non-governmental organisations or commercial organisations
Coapplicants can ask for salary if they are employed by these organisations. The amount we pay will be proportionate to the time they will contribute to the award. Their employment contract does not need to state that they must get their salary from external grant funding.
Staff working on your programme
We will cover the salary costs of all staff, full or part-time, who will work on your grant.
Staff members may include:
- research assistants or technicians employed on your grant
- experts with lived experience
- specialist service staff and technical experts, for example in environmental sustainability, data analysis, fieldwork and clinical studies
- project manager, if you have multiple applicants on your programme
- support if you or a member of staff employed on your grant is disabled or has a long-term health condition
Teaching buyout
Humanities and social science researchers can ask for funds for research or teaching replacement to cover the cost of a temporary replacement lecturer. They must retain at least a 10% commitment to teaching.
Costs:
- can cover up to 33% FTE of your contracted time
- are usually for a person at a more junior level than the postholder
- can be spread across the full period of the grant
Researchers who already get buyout costs from another grant (funded by Wellcome or elsewhere) can ask us for this cost, but only for the period of time on the award when they won't receive buyout costs from another grant.
Staff salaries should be appropriate to skills, responsibilities and expertise. You should ask your host organisation to use their salary scales to calculate these costs, which should include:
- basic salary
- employer’s contributions, including any statutory obligations (for example, National Insurance contributions if you’re based in the UK) and pension scheme costs
- Apprentice Levy charges for UK-based salaries
- any incremental progression up the salary scale
- locally recognised allowances such as London allowance.
You should allow for salary pay awards during Year 1. If the pay award is not yet known, applicants should use the International Monetary Fund inflation rate, selecting the ‘inflation, average consumer price’ option as an indicator.
Read about the responsibilities of grantholders and host organisations for people working on a Wellcome grant.
If you have named people on your grant whose salaries will be funded by Wellcome, you can ask for visa or work permit costs to help them take up their posts at the host organisation. You can also ask for:
- visa costs for the person's partner and dependent children
- essential associated costs, such as travel to attend appointments at a visa application centre or embassy, and essential English language tests
- Immigration Health Surcharge costs for the person, their partner and dependent children if they will be in the UK for six months or more.
If you or a member of staff working on your grant is disabled or has a long-term health condition, you can ask for adjustment support to help you carry out your project.
Costs can include, but are not limited to:
- additional costs for staff to help with day-to-day activities related to your project
- assistive technology to help use computers, research equipment or materials – for example, text to audio software
- care costs for assistance animals if you need to travel.
We will not pay for capital or building costs, such as access ramps.
You can ask for these costs if your government and/or employer:
- does not cover any of the costs
- only covers some of the costs (if they do, we will only meet the shortfall).
The costs we provide must not replace the support you may get from the government or your organisation, who are responsible for providing these costs.
If you don't know what these costs are now, you can ask for them after we've awarded your grant.
You can ask for these costs if you are applying from a:
- higher education institution
- research institute
- healthcare organisation
- charity, social enterprise or non-governmental research organisation
- small or medium sized commercial organisation
Continuing professional development and professional skills training
You can ask for a contribution towards these costs.
Types of training can include:
- research leadership, professional and people management skills
- career development support
- responsible conduct of research
- diversity and inclusion
- promotion of a healthy research culture
- understanding and reducing the environmental impact of research
We expect the employing organisation to provide and fund this training. However, if these types of training are not available, or the quality is inadequate, you can ask for up to £500 a year for lead applicants, coapplicants and each member of staff employed on your grant who will be:
- in a post of 12 months duration or more only and
- working on Wellcome funded awards for at least 50% full time equivalent
You will need to justify these costs in your application.
Research skills training
You can ask for costs to cover training for the technical and research skills you need to deliver your proposed research.
You can ask for whatever research skills training you need for lead applicants, coapplicants and each member of staff employed on your grant, who will be:
- in a post of 12 months duration or more only and
- working on Wellcome funded awards for at least 50% full time equivalent
Types of training may include:
- building sustainable partnerships with researchers and implementation partners
- research communication skills
- developing meaningful lived experience plans
- health economic analysis
- implementation science
- intervention evaluation and statistical analysis
You will need to justify these costs in your application.
We will pay for the materials and consumables you need to carry out your project, including:
- printing associated with fieldwork and empirical research
- associated charges for shipping, delivery and freight
You can ask for the cost of access to shared equipment, facilities or services if they’re essential to your project.
These may include materials and consumables, plus a proportion of:
- maintenance and service contracts
- staff time costs for dedicated technical staff employed to operate the equipment or facility
We don’t cover the costs of:
- estates and utilities
- depreciation or insurance
- other staff, for example, contributions towards departmental technical, administrative and management staff time
We do cover these costs if related to animal housing facilities.
If the facilities or equipment were paid for by a Wellcome grant, you can only ask for access charges if:
- the grant has ended
- any support for running costs and maintenance contracts has ended
Computer equipment
We will cover the cost of one personal computer or laptop per person up to £1,500.
We won't pay for:
- more expensive items, unless you can justify them
- installation or training costs
Fieldwork costs can include:
- survey and data collection, including communication and data collection services and any associated costs such as essential field materials, travel costs and language translation services
- the purchase, hire and running costs of vehicles dedicated to your project
- expenses for subjects and volunteers, including the recruitment of participants, their participatory fees and travel costs
- statistical analysis
You can ask for these costs if you are applying from a:
- higher education institution
- research institute
- healthcare organisation
- charity, social enterprise or non-governmental research organisation
- small or medium sized commercial organisation
Environmentally conscious travel
Travel on grants should be done in an environmentally conscious way. You should consider if you could meet your trip’s objectives using video conferencing, hybrid meetings or virtual attendance.
Where travel is necessary, you can ask for:
- the cost of low carbon travel where practical, even if it's more expensive (for example travelling by train instead of flying)
- project-related resources or activities that provide an alternative to travel, such as video conferencing, communication and file-sharing software
- costs to offset the carbon emissions of the journeys you make
We will not pay for business class flights.
We won't pay for the core infrastructure that your administering organisation should provide, unless you're eligible to ask for these costs under our overheads policy. Examples of these costs include:
- organisation-wide video conferencing packages
- high-speed broadband
- HD screens
Travel costs
Conference attendance
You can ask for a contribution towards the costs of attending scientific and academic meetings and conferences, including registration fees and the costs to offset the carbon emissions of your travel. The limits are:
- Lead applicant – £2,000 a year
- Coapplicants – £2,000 each a year
- Research and technical staff employed on your grant – £1,000 each a year
We provide costs to cover caring responsibilities for any staff employed on your grant to attend a conference. This includes childcare and any other caring responsibility they have. We will pay these if:
- Wellcome is providing the salary
- the conference is directly related to the research
- the caring costs are over and above what they would normally pay for care
- the conference organiser and their employing organisation are unable to cover the costs
You can ask for up to £1,000 per person for each conference.
Collaborative travel
Lead applicants, coapplicants or members of the research team can ask for travel costs to work on the grant with other people essential to the research, for example, meeting with other members or the research team or collaborators. You’ll need to justify each visit and its duration.
Other travel
We will pay for other essential visits, for example to facilities, libraries, archives, sample collection and for fieldwork.
Subsistence costs
Up to one month
If you’re away for up to one month you can ask for subsistence costs. These include accommodation, meals and incidentals (for example, refreshments or newspapers).
If your administering organisation has a subsistence policy, use their rates.
If your administering organisation doesn’t have a subsistence policy, please use the HMRC rates.
1 to 12 months
If you’re away for more than one month and up to 12 months, we will pay reasonable rental costs only, including aparthotels. You should discuss appropriate rates with the administering and employing organisations, or Wellcome, as needed. We expect you to choose the most economical options, booked in advance where possible.
If you’re from a low- or middle- income country and will be working in a high-income country for more than one month and up to 12 months, you can also ask for up to £10 a day to cover extra costs, such as transport.
Overseas research
If you or any research staff employed on your grant will be doing research away from your home organisation, we'll help with the additional costs of working on the project overseas. Read the 'Overseas allowances' section for details.
You can ask for these costs if you are applying from a:
- higher education institution
- research institute
- healthcare organisation
- charity, social enterprise or non-governmental research organisation
If you or any staff employed on your grant will be spending time in another country, we’ll help you with the additional costs of working on the project overseas.
Our overseas allowances are:
- a contribution towards the personal cost of carrying out research overseas, to ensure that you are not disadvantaged
- provided on the assumption that you’ll be paying income tax, either in your home country, or the country you will be working in (your personal tax is your responsibility)
- provided on the understanding that you or your partner will not receive equivalent allowances from elsewhere
- determined by the amount of time you will spend away from your home country
Carbon offset costs
We expect the people we fund to choose travel that has a lower carbon impact, where practical, even if it’s more expensive (for example travelling by train instead of flying). We will not pay for business class flights.
You can ask for costs to offset the carbon generated by the travel, as part of your overseas allowances. If carbon offsetting for travel is not part of your organisational sustainability strategy, you can ask us for a similar level of support for other sustainability initiatives. Your organisation must get our approval for other sustainability initiatives to be included in applications.
Read our environmental sustainability funding policy for what you and your organisation can do.
If you will be away for 12 months or less and can justify why your partner and dependants must travel with you, we may provide overseas allowances for them.
We define your partner as the person:
- you’re married to
- you’re not married to but with whom you’ve been in a relationship for at least a year
We will pay your travel costs at the beginning and end of your overseas work. Costs can be for air, ferry, train or coach fares. We will not pay for business class flights.
All fares should be:
- in line with our environmental sustainability funding policy
- booked in advance where possible
If you are away for up to 12 months, you can ask for up to 80kg of additional baggage or unaccompanied airline freight for your outward and return journeys.
We will pay the cost of your medical insurance and travel insurance.
If you will be working in a low- or middle-income country we will also cover the cost of emergency evacuation cover.
We won’t pay for medical insurance if you will be based in the UK or Republic of Ireland.
We will pay the costs of visas, vaccinations and anti-malaria treatment.
You can ask for this if you’ll be based in a low- or middle-income country and it is necessary.
Costs can include guards, panic buttons and alarms. You should ask your employing organisation for advice on the level of security you need.
If you’re away for up to one month
You can ask for subsistence costs. These include accommodation, meals and incidentals (for example, refreshments or newspapers).
If your administering organisation has a subsistence policy, use their rates.
If your administering organisation doesn’t have a subsistence policy, please use the HMRC rates.
If you’re away for more than one month and up to 12 months
We will pay reasonable rental costs only, including aparthotels. You should discuss appropriate rates with your administering and host organisations, or Wellcome, as appropriate. We expect you to choose the most economical options, booked in advance where possible.
If you’re from a low- or middle- income country and will be working in a high-income country for more than one month and up to 12 months, you can also ask for up to £10 a day to cover extra costs, such as transport and incidentals.
You should ask for the necessary costs to integrate key stakeholders’ perspectives across the life cycle of your project, from agenda setting, funding, and research design to implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. You cannot ask for costs for any activities that take place before the grant start date.
Costs can include, but are not limited to:
- compensation for stakeholders’ time and expertise
- recruitment of participants, participatory fees, travel and other reasonable expenses
- incentives and recognition for involvement for example, gift cards, one-off awards. These must be aligned with our Research involving human participants policy and avoid undue inducement to take part.
- engagement professionals, for example community outreach coordinators, patient advocates, engaged research advisory board, lived experience experts
- room hire, catering and other associated costs of running interviews, workshops, focus groups, partnership building and other activities to integrate stakeholder voices into your research
- translation services, accessibility costs, survey tools to facilitate inclusive knowledge sharing
- monitoring and evaluation activities
For more information, read our guidance on using an engaged research approach.
You can ask for costs associated with disseminating research results and findings from Wellcome-funded research, including podcasts, media outreach, websites and talks.
For costs associated with written publications, consult our open access policy.
If you are involving people with lived experience at the application design stage, you cannot include a consultation charge for this work. Wellcome will not be held responsible for any costs associated with the production of a response to the foundation phase of this funding call. Consultation charges for design work included in the foundation phase for an application to the impact phase will be allowed.
We expect people with lived experience involved in projects to be appropriately compensated or paid for their time. The budget that must be requested during the application process should include appropriate remuneration for lived experience experts and costs for involvement.
We cannot advise on ways to appropriately compensate or pay people with lived experience, as approaches differ between organisations and contexts. When thinking about appropriate compensation or payment, we would encourage you to think about the experience, knowledge, and skills that someone will be bringing to the project, as well as their responsibility within the process. Make sure that you have appropriately budgeted for the costs needed to support meaningful involvement, as set out in your proposal. For example, this could include but is not limited to:
- consultant fees for lived experience experts on the project
- travel costs
- salary costs for lived experience researchers embedded in a team
- expenses to support meetings or workshops
We cannot advise on income tax or state benefits, in terms of people with lived experience being paid for their involvement, as the arrangements will be different in different countries. It is the responsibility of the research team to ensure that they are abiding by any relevant regulations in their context, and the team should seek advice from relevant local organisations if needed.
You can ask for overheads if your administering organisation is a:
- university outside the UK
- research organisation that does not receive core funding for overheads
- charity, social enterprise or non-governmental research organisation
- small or medium sized commercial organisation
You can also ask for overheads on any part of your grant that is sub-contracted to any of the organisations listed above.
If you’re based at a UK university, you can’t ask for overheads for sub-contracted activity if your university will include the sub-contracted funding in its annual report to the UK Charity Research Support Fund.
Overheads can include:
- estates, for example building and premises
- non-project dedicated administrative and support staff
- administration, for example finance, library, and room hire
The total cost for overheads should not be more than 20% of the costs requested in your application.
These costs must directly support the activity funded by the grant.
How to apply for these costs
In your grant application, you must include a letter from your Finance Director stating how the overhead costs have been calculated.
If your organisation has an externally audited or otherwise verified methodology for calculating overhead rates, then the letter must include:
- confirmation of the validated rate
- how the rate was arrived at/who provided the rate
- when the rate was last reviewed
- where details of the rate can be found
If your organisation does not have an externally audited or otherwise verified methodology for calculating overhead rates, then the letter must include:
- a breakdown of the costs requested
- confirmation that the request is a true representation of the costs incurred
If your organisation receives open access block grant funding, you can ask them to cover your open access article processing charges.
If you're at an organisation that does not receive block grant funding, we’ll supplement your grant when your paper has been accepted for publication.
You cannot ask for these charges in your grant application.
Allowed costs
You may ask for the following costs (you will have to justify them in your application):
- specialist publications that are relevant to the research and not available in institutional libraries
- consultancy fees, including for lived experience experts
- expenses for subjects and volunteers – includes recruitment of participants, their participatory fees and travel, as well as interviewee expenses
- reasonable research-associated costs related to the feedback of health-related findings but not any healthcare-associated costs
- costs associated with developing an outputs management plan
- questionnaires, recruitment material, and newsletters for clinical, epidemiological and qualitative research studies
- public engagement materials where dissemination (including printing and publishing) is a key activity of the project
- recruitment, advertising and interviewee travel costs for staff to be employed on the grant
- purchase, hire and running costs of project-dedicated vehicles
- project-specific personal protective equipment (PPE) that is above the standard expected for the setting
- costs to host/a contribution towards hosting:
- networking and knowledge exchange activities
- a conference
- a session within a conference
- a symposium
- a seminar series
- advisory board meetings, if appropriate
The meeting should either be:
- for research purposes, for example data gathering
- to disseminate your research findings, for example to policy makers.
Costs can include:
- travel and accommodation for keynote speakers
- external room hire and catering
- event publicity and conference materials
- childcare and other caring responsibility costs for delegates
- any costs related to accessibility and inclusion
Disallowed costs
We will not pay for:
- phone, postage, photocopying and stationery, unless you can justify these within a clinical or epidemiological study
- page charges and the cost of colour prints
- PhD stipends
- office furniture, such as chairs, desks and filing cabinets
- clothing such as lab coats and shoes
- non-research related activities such as catering, room and venue hire for staff parties, team-building events and social activities
- indemnity insurance (insurance cover against claims made by subjects or patients associated with a research programme)
- ethics reviews, unless you are in a low- or middle-income country
- radiation protection costs
- contingency funds
- organisation insurance
- clinical examination or course fees
- working capital costs of commercial organisations
- engagement activities that do not support an engaged approach to research or for one-off events/exhibitions
How to apply
Where to apply
Apply for this funding call on the Wellcome Funding Platform. You must complete this checklist and include it in your application. You can save your application and return to it any time.
Information you need to provide
Please outline any coapplicants and collaborators involved in your application in the 'other participants' section of the application form, clearly indicating who will be a coapplicant and who will be a collaborator. Please clearly identify the early-career coapplicant and please provide the month and the year that they passed their viva (or equivalent research experience if applicable) and any career breaks that they have had during that time.
1. Checklist
You must attach the completed checklist to your application in the ‘Additional information’ section of the form. This will not count towards your two page A4 limit for additional information. Applications that are submitted without a checklist attached, or an incomplete checklist, will be automatically withdrawn.
Each checklist section corresponds to the five key criteria outlined under 'What your research must include'.
2. Letters of support from implementation partners
As part of your application, you will need to provide a letter for each coapplicant/collaborator organisation that has been identified as an implementation partner. Each letter must be a single A4 page that:
- details any in kind resource, funding and time committed to the project
- demonstrates the implementation partner's commitment to the work outlined in the funding proposal
- lists the name, job role, organisation (where applicable) and contact information for the implementation partner
Upload the letter(s) to your application, in the ‘Additional information’ section of the form. These letters will not count towards your two A4 page limit for additional information. Applications that are submitted without the relevant letters attached, will be automatically withdrawn.
3. Plain language summary of the intervention for the youth panel
As part of your application, you will need to provide a plain language summary of the intervention. This will be reviewed by an international panel of young people and contribute to the assessment of your proposal as outlined in the assessment criteria. The summary should:
- be a maximum of 250 words
- summarise details of the intervention and plans for implementation and scaling
- not contain any jargon and any technical terms should be explained
The Plain Language Campaign has produced a series of guides for writing in plain language, which can be downloaded free of charge.
Include your plain language summary as additional information to support your application. This will not count towards your two A4 page limit for additional information.
4. Logic model
You must include a logic model with your application that identifies the active ingredient(s) of your intervention. Include this as additional information to support your application. This will not count towards your two A4 page limit for additional information.
Getting support with your application
We offer disability-related support for applicants. Read the disability-related support guidance if you:
- are disabled or have a long-term health condition and you need help applying for funding
- need help completing your project, for example costs for assistive technology
If you need further support with completing your application or need to request an extension to the deadline, please contact us.
If this is your organisation’s first time applying for Wellcome funding
If this is your administering organisation’s first time applying for Wellcome funding, they will need to contact us to request an organisation account.
Email fundingsupport@wellcome.org with your organisation’s:
- name
- address
- country
- team email address for the people who will approve and submit your application (this is usually a research management team)
We will create the administering organisation account and provide access to the approvers. Review our guidance for research offices.
Application process
Before you apply
- Make sure you read everything on this page. View the sample application form.
- You do not need to contact us before you write and submit your application.
- If you are unsure if your proposal is within the scope of this call, you can request a scope check before submitting your full application.
- Register to attend out information webinar on 3 September 2025. Registration for this webinar will open shorty and linked to from this page.
Submit your application to your administering organisation for approval
- Complete your application form on Wellcome Funding platform.
- Submit your completed application form to your administering organisation for approval.
- Make sure you leave enough time for your administering organisation to review and submit your application before the deadline. The approver may ask you to make changes to your application.
Administering organisation approves and submits it to Wellcome
- Your application must be submitted by 15.00 GMT on the deadline day, 11 November. We do not accept late applications.
Shortlisting
- We will check your eligibility for the call and that your proposed research is within the call’s scope. If your application is ineligible or your proposed research does not meet the aims of the funding call, we will withdraw your application and notify you of this.
- Wellcome staff will review eligible and in remit applications against the assessment criteria.
- If your application is shortlisted, your application will proceed to the next stage.
- We are unable to provide feedback on applications that are not shortlisted.
Youth Panel review
- The plain language summaries of all shortlisted applications will be reviewed by an international panel of young people who have lived experience of anxiety, depression and psychosis. They will use these summaries to rank shortlisted applications according to the assessment criteria described on this page.
Committee review
- A committee will review shortlisted proposals and the rankings provided by the panel of young people to make funding recommendations to Wellcome.
- Committee members will be chosen based on their expertise within the relevant research field. Committee membership will be comprised of a diverse range of international members and will take into account Wellcome’s diversity and inclusion priorities.
- Once the committee has been appointed, we will update this webpage to include its details.
Funding decision
- Final funding decisions will be made by Wellcome.
- You will receive an email notification of the Foundation Phase funding decision soon after the decision has been made in March 2026.
- The reasons for a decision will be provided to unsuccessful applicants in writing.
Application process timeline
You must submit your application by 15:00 GMT on the deadline day. We don’t accept late applications.
- Week commencing 28 July 2025
Call opens to applications
- 3 September 2025, 10:30-11:30 BST
Information webinar
Registration opens soon
- 11 November 2025
Foundation Phase application deadline
- January 2026
Foundation Phase shortlisting
- March 2026
Foundation Phase interview committee
- March 2026
Foundation Phase funding decision
- February 2027
Impact Phase opens to applications
Successful applications from the Foundation Phase will be invited to apply to the Impact Phase.
- May 2027
Impact Phase application deadline
Contact us
Eligibility, what we offer and application questions
If you have a question about eligibility, what we offer or about completing the application form using Wellcome Funding, send our funding information advisers a message.
Scope questions
If you are unclear about whether your proposed idea would be in scope for this call, you can send a brief summary of your idea (no more than 200 words) by 14 October 2025 17:00 BST to ScopeChecksMH@wellcome.org.
Please include the title of the call - Mental Health Award: Transforming early intervention for anxiety, depression and psychosis in young people - in the subject line.
Use the following format when emailing us your scope question:
- country where the Impact Phase research will take place (no more than a sentence)
- the intervention (no more than a sentence)
- population - age range and mental health condition(s)/symptoms(s) (no more than a sentence)
- existing efficacy data for the intervention (no more than a sentence)
- summary of your project proposal for the Impact Phase (no more than 200 words)
Based on the information provided, we will aim to reply to your email within one week, with an 'in scope' or 'out of scope' response.
Please note that submitting a scope check is not a requirement and will not impact your likelihood of being funded. The confirmation that a proposed idea is in scope does not constitute an active invitation to apply for the call.
We do not answer questions on the competitiveness of proposals.