PhD merit needs to be defined by more than just publications
There needs to be a change in how PhDs are assessed to promote a more positive culture for early career researchers.
Our review reveals high levels of satisfaction with biomedical PhD training overall, but significant levels of worry and uncertainty among students.
We're looking at how we can improve our PhD programmes in science to support a more positive research culture.
Click images to open gallery
This article is part of our campaign to build a better research culture – one that is creative, inclusive and honest. Tell us what matters.
There needs to be a change in how PhDs are assessed to promote a more positive culture for early career researchers.
The new PhD programmes in science that we’re funding combine scientific excellence with a commitment to improving the working environment for trainees.
The emphasis on excellence in the research system is stifling diverse thinking and positive behaviours. As a community we can rethink our approach to research culture.