Press release

Ebola vaccine shows promising results

Interim results from the Guinean phase III trial of the Ebola vaccine known as VSV-EBOV, co-funded by the Wellcome Trust, indicate that it is highly effective against the virus.

The vaccine shows up to 100% efficacy in individuals, but more conclusive evidence is needed on its capacity to protect populations through what is called 'herd immunity' and the ability to interrupt transmission. Preliminary results from analyses of these interim data are published today in the journal The Lancet.

The Guinea vaccination trial began in affected communities on 23 March 2015 to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of a single dose of the vaccine VSV-EBOV by using a 'ring' vaccination strategy. By vaccinating all people who have come into contact with an infected person you can create a protective ‘ring’ and stop the virus from spreading further.

So far, more than 7,600 people who have had close contact with Ebola patients, including family members, neighbours, and co-workers, have voluntarily participated in the trial.

An independent body of international experts - the Data and Safety Monitoring Board – have advised that the trial should continue. The Guinean national regulatory authority and ethics review committee have also approved continuation of the trial.

The Wellcome Trust, with contributions from DFID, have given more than £5.2 million to support clinical trials of the VSV-EBOV vaccine. The trial is being implemented by the Guinean authorities, WHO, Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, with support from a broad partnership of international and national organizations.

Dr Jeremy Farrar, Director of the Wellcome Trust, said: "This trial dared to use a highly innovative and pragmatic design, which allowed the team in Guinea to assess this vaccine in the middle of an epidemic. It is a remarkable result, and one that shows the power of equitable international partnerships and flexibility.

"Our hope is that this vaccine will now help bring this epidemic to an end and be available for the inevitable future Ebola epidemics. This partnership also shows that such critical work is possible in the midst of a terrible epidemic. It should change how the world responds to emerging infectious disease threats. We, and all our partners, remain fully committed to giving the world a safe and effective vaccine."

The VSV-EBOV trial stopped randomisation on 26 July to allow for all people at risk to receive the vaccine immediately, and to minimize the time necessary to gather more conclusive evidence needed for eventual licensure of the product. Until now, 50% of the rings were vaccinated three weeks after the identification of an infected patient to provide a term of comparison with rings that were vaccinated immediately. This now stops. In addition, the trial will now children on the basis of new evidence of the vaccine’s safety.

WHO Assistant Director-General Marie-Paule Kieny, who leads the Ebola Research and Development effort, said: "This record-breaking work marks a turning point in the history of health R&D. We now know that the urgency of saving lives can accelerate R&D. We will harness this positive experience to develop a global R&D preparedness framework so that if another major disease outbreak ever happens again, for any disease, the world can act quickly and efficiently to develop and use medical tools and prevent a large-scale tragedy."

Dr. Sakoba Keita, Guinea’s national coordinator for the Ebola response, said: "This is Guinea’s gift to West Africa and the world. The thousands of volunteers from Conakry and other areas of Lower Guinea, but also the many Guinean doctors, data managers and community mobilisers have contributed to finding a line of defence against a terrible disease."

Dr Dan O’Connor, Head of Humanities and Social Science at the Wellcome Trust said: "The success of the ‘ring’ strategy is a hugely important step forward for research ethics. It shows not only that we can conduct urgently needed, rapid response research during epidemics, but that we can do so in a way that is both ethically sound and responsive to the needs of affected communities."