Tools to Highlight Impact and Aid Curation of Scholarly Outputs

The proliferation of scholarly content and implementation of transparent peer review are creating challenges for readers and evaluators to assess research significance and review outcomes, and for journals to curate field-specific content. We propose controlled experiments in which we test the utility of badges and impact statements to signal the significance of articles published by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in its research journal, Molecular Biology of the Cell (MBoC). We will devise badges that alert readers to article attributes such as new concept, broadly relevant, technical advance, teaching resource, etc. We will also experiment with new peer review processes, including a streamlined process designed to concisely identify points of significance and key issues, and one in which authors, reviewers, and editors work together to craft concise impact statements for display on articles. The effects of these innovations will be assessed relative to traditional practices by comparing article-level metrics including article views, downloads, and Altmetrics attention scores and by surveys. We will then use these innovations and the expertise of ASCB members, including early career scientists, to curate preprints and articles in other venues with the goal of providing standard, portable tools for use by other publishers.